Use iCloud to sync a Mac app with an iOS app
A valid complaint of iCloud is that Mac apps like TextEdit and Preview don’t have iOS versions, so any documents you store in their iCould spaces are not accessible on iOS devices —- only on other Macs. However, I’ve found you can get around this.
For the iOS app you want to sync with, make sure it is set to be syncing documents with iCloud. For some apps, this is by default, for others, it is an optional setting.
In the Finder, go to your home folder’s Library folder. Since recent versions of OS X hide this, the easiest way is to go to the Finder and select “Go > Go to Folder …” (or shift+command+G), then type “~/Library” into the box and press Go (or press Enter).
Scroll down and go into the “Mobile Documents” folder within. In there you will see folders with names ending in apps you have that are syncing documents with iCloud.
Find the folder for the Mac app you want to sync to the iOS app, and select it. For example, TextEdit is in
com~apple~TextEdit. Inside you will see a
Documents folder. If you have documents in there, you will need to move them out temporarily. Now, delete this
Go to the folder for the iOS app you want to connect to the Mac app. For example, Byword on my system is in
N39PJFAFEV~com~metaclassy~byword. In there, you will see its
Documents folder. Drag this into the Mac app’s folder (
com~apple~TextEdit in the example) while holding the Command and Option keys to make an alias (you should get a curved arrow pointer).
If you had files you moved out of the Mac app’s
Documents folder temporarily, you can move them back into the folder, which is now an alias.
That’s it. Now make a document in the Mac app, save it in its iCloud space and watch it show up in your iOS app.
You need to make sure you are connecting up compatible apps. For example, TextEdit can create and edit plain text files that Byword is compatible with, but it can also create and edit other types it is not. So, in this example, you would want to only save plain text files to iCloud in TextEdit and keep other types not in iCloud.
Another example connection would be to connect Preview’s iCloud documents folder to GoodReader’s or a similar app that can view many file types.
LG HBS700 Bluetooth Stereo Headset
I hemmed and hawed for some time over what to get for a wireless headset to more comfortably listen to mostly podcasts without a cord in the way. I have gone through several regular Bluetooth headsets over the years not being greatly impressed with their durability, comfort or call quality.
I came across the HBS700 set by LG (also called the LG Tone). This was a unique style as far as I can tell. It is a behind-the-neck band style, but with a thin band. It hangs down around your neck and has in-ear earbuds that come up with short wires from the unit. This more closely resembles those that use a relatively short headphone that plugs into a unit that clips onto your clothing. However, those have too much cord length with some being nearly full length.
As long as you are comfortable with the in-ear silicone earbuds, these are a great solution to the comfort problem since it’s just some small earbuds in your ears and not a rigid, heavy band around your head and over your ears like the Motorola S9-HD. Jabra has a set with a soft behind the neck cord, but those have bulky behind-the-ear earpieces that hang on your ear. There are Bluetooth sets with corded earbuds, but the cords seem too long to me to avoid getting in the way like normal corded headphones, and you have to be able to clip the unit’s body to your clothing.
One thing the corded earbud styles can do that the others can’t is to be able to use only one ear with the other open for listening to what’s around you. I often do this since I’m listening to mostly talk podcasts to be able to hear surroundings well while biking or walking around the house. I liked this about my regular iPhone headphones. With corded earphones, the problem is where to put the unused bud. Usually, you have to tuck it under a collar. The HBS700, with its very short cords are not much problem to just let the unused bud hang down, but it has handy magnetic storage cups at the end of each side of the neck band for the ear buds.
The neck band is quite flexible and small. With the earbuds on their little cords, bumping the headset body doesn’t bother them or your ears. It is easy to lie back and fall asleep with these on. It’s also easy to forget they are there if just stored around your neck (especially if you tucked them under your collar), so you have to be careful taking your shirt off to to remember they are there and not send them flying. So far, they have survived a few drops onto the wood floor.
I do like being able to tuck the unit under the collar of a shirt or under the neck of a collarless shirt to make it less obvious, but depending on the shirt, this can make it tricky to feel for the buttons. However, I can go all day with it stored there rather than have to worry about packing it in a bag. You might could with the S9-HDs, but with their over-ear hooks, they don’t lie very flat.
The controls are pretty easy to get used to even though the button shapes are the same on the left and right, which would seem to be a bit confusing to remember. Each side has an up/down rocker button and a round button. The left side is volume up/down with the call button. The right side is volume up/down with the pause/play button. They aren’t three closely-spaced identical buttons on each side, so they are easy to operate by feel. The down side is that they can be accidentally pressed when turning your head extremely to the side and down, like when riding a bike and looking behind you.
Another nice departure from most Bluetooth headsets is that it has a separate on/off switch so you don’t have to hold the multifunction button and wait to hear the audible confirmation. It also has a simple battery level check of holding down the volume down button and seeing a low/medium/full color of the light next to it. Yes, there is the requisite flashing blue light, but I haven’t found it distracting, especially if I’ve tucked it under my collar.
I’ve managed to get the multi-point feature to work, but that seems only because my original iPad does not support both A2DP and headset protocols —- only A2DP, so the headset part is available for my iPhone to grab, but you have to do a settings dance to make it happen. With it paired to both the iPad and iPhone and both with their Bluetooth on, turning on the headset always seems to connect to the iPhone for both headset and A2DP. To get A2DP from the iPad and headset to the iPhone, you need to turn off the Bluetooth on the iPhone, turn on the headset, its A2DP will connect to the iPad. Then, turn the iPhone Bluetooth back on, and it should connect to the remaining headset profile. Like I said, I think this is only possible with the iPad 1. I’ve noticed that you get one beep in the headset for each profile connecting, which isn’t in the documentation
For phone calls, which I don’t do very much, it is nice to just keep it around your neck with no earbud in your ear all the time and just reach for one earbud to take a call when you need to.
Also, the call quality is very good. Importantly, the caller can hear me very well —- better than any other headset I’ve tried. I’m sure it may not be the best, but it is certainly better than most.
In the car, I like using it with one bud in to easily take calls and listen to podcasts rather than using the car stereo. I can keep listening while getting out of the car and walking to my destination, which is especially nice if I’ve just left the phone in my pocket the whole time.
I’ve also used it while riding my bicycle several times and have really enjoyed it despite having to be careful to not pinch it under my neck when doing a head check to avoid accidentally pressing one of the controls. I don’t know if it would do very well if you were to sweat a lot. I don’t usually, and haven’t done with it on yet. It looks like it might be okay against sweat on your body, but it could be susceptible to sweat dripping onto the buttons.
Another big problem with many Bluetooth headsets I’ve used is reception. This is mainly since your body absorbs the 2.4 GHz frequency that Bluetooth uses, and often you can have a lot of body in-between it and your phone. An interesting effect is that indoors, you get better reception because there are things nearby that the signal can bounce off of to go around you. This headset seems to have good reception outdoors, so that I rarely get dropouts. Indoors I get pretty much the full Bluetooth range, which means I generally don’t have to walk around with the phone. Unfortunately, with our microwave, it can’t be used in the kitchen when it’s on.
Overall, it’s been really enjoyable.
- Good call quality
- Good reception
- Good battery life
- Very comfortable and convenient design
- Earbud cords, although short, can be fiddly sometimes.
- Earbuds have small bodies, which is generally good, but they can be tricky to get seated.
- You can forget they’re around your neck when taking off your shirt and fling them on the floor.
There us a new version out now, the HBS730. It has improvements feature-wise, but many reviews are saying that the reception sensitivity is greatly reduced from the HBS700 which means reduced range and more susceptible to body blockage.
The Daily Mail reporting on NPD research with a story titled:
Are smart TV’s too clever for their own good? Researchers find we simply want to watch our favourite shows
Duh. We need research for this?
Apple has long been rumored to be interested in creating a TV that focuses on content …
Yeah, it’s called your HDTV with an Apple TV hooked to it.
The 8 inch iPad
The 7 inch iPad rumors that I wrote about before have now become ~8 inch iPad rumors. My point last time was that the price people were fantasizing about was too low. Guess what, this time it’s the same thing.
At least for the 8 inch iPad rumors, the hardware particulars have evolved to make more sense:
- Same display tech as the iPhone 3GS: non-retina 163 pixels/inch.
- Same pixel count as the iPads 1 and 2: 1024 by 768.
From these, several other specs follow:
- Same aspect ratio as the other iPads of 4:3.
- Diagonal screen size of 7.85 inches.
- Apps could run as if they are on an iPad 1 or 2, using the same 1x resources without adjustment.
- UI elements would be smaller than the full iPad, but they would be the same size as on the iPhone because they are made (nominally) with the same pixel count and thus appeared larger on a regular iPad.
With the same pixel count as a non-retina iPad, it would only require the A5 of the iPad 2, which was recently shrunk for the “new” iPad 2 being sold along side the iPad 3. With a non-retina screen, it wouldn’t need as much RAM as the iPad 3, so would have 512MB like the iPad 2.
Where things still got unbelievable was the price. Once Google announced their Nexus 7 Android tablet at $199, everyone was talking about the 8 inch iPad as if it would sell for $199. Again, it was more wishing for a cheap iPad. As i said before, that cheap $199 iPad is the 8GB iPod touch that everyone keeps forgetting about. In other words: no way that there will be a $199 iPad.
Even the fact that Google said they are not making money on the hardware at $199 didn’t seem to make people realize that a $199 iPad would not be real. Some made the rationalization that Apple is able to make better manufacturing deals than everybody else (generally true), and so they could produce the same hardware as someone else for less and thus make a profit. I still find this a stretch at $199 unless a non-retina 8GB iPod touch appears for $149.
Also, how much storage would it have for $199? It seems a stretch to say anything beyond 8GB at that price, which would be pretty small for an iPad. However, the idea is that with iTunes Match, you wouldn’t need to keep your entire music library on it. I have my doubts since if I took all the music off my iPad now, the rest would still not fit in 32GB. Sure, I’m not average, but most of the space is apps. Remember, that on a non-retina device, the app still contains retina resources, so they are larger these days. Maybe Apple can update iTunes to strip retina resources when syncing to non-retina devices, but I think 8GB would be tight.
When I estimated a hypothetical 7 inch iPad price at about $349, it was assuming it would have a retina display. So, let’s see what one with a non-retinal display would be.
We’ll assume these specs:
- 1024x768, non-retina, 163 ppi, 7.85 inch display.
- A5 system chip (updated version)
- 512 MB RAM
- 16 GB flash storage
I think this would be $299. If it starts at 8GB, then maybe $249. Basically though, $100 less than the current re-issue of the 16 GB iPad 2.
The 7 inch iPad
All these ~7” iPad discussions seem to me to be really fantasies about a cheap iPad that try to justify it with a size argument that reckons if it were smaller it must cost less. Most forget that a 32 GB iPod touch costs $299 and there is not a 16 GB touch that costs $100 less – it’s an 8GB model, and a 16GB iPad 2 (non-retina display) is $399.
The 32GB wifi retina iPad is $599 and a 32GB wifi retina iPod touch is $299. I’m going to scale cost in between linearly with display area, which isn’t perfect, but it roughly captures display size and battery size. I get $434 for a 7” 4:3 display, so call it $399-$449. If we use iPad flash price deltas, then you could say a 16GB model could be $299-$349.
A flaw in my reckoning is that new iPad has an A5X and 1GB RAM and the touch has an A4 with 256MB RAM. A hypothetical iPad mini might use just an A5 and 512MB RAM, so we’ll go with the higher end of the range and say $349.